Developing and evaluating criteria to help reviewers of biomedical informatics manuscripts.
Peer-reviewed publication of scientific research results represents the most important means of their communication. The authors have annually reviewed a large heterogeneous set of papers to produce the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Yearbook of Medical Informatics. To support an objective and high-quality review process, the authors attempted to provide reviewers with a set of refined quality criteria, comprised of 80 general criteria and an additional 60 criteria for specific [...]
Author(s): Ammenwerth, Elske, Wolff, Astrid C, Knaup, Petra, Ulmer, Hanno, Skonetzki, Stefan, van Bemmel, Jan H, McCray, Alexa T, Haux, Reinhold, Kulikowski, Casimir
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1062