A pattern-based analysis of clinical computer-interpretable guideline modeling languages.
Languages used to specify computer-interpretable guidelines (CIGs) differ in their approaches to addressing particular modeling challenges. The main goals of this article are: (1) to examine the expressive power of CIG modeling languages, and (2) to define the differences, from the control-flow perspective, between process languages in workflow management systems and modeling languages used to design clinical guidelines.
Author(s): Mulyar, Nataliya, van der Aalst, Wil M P, Peleg, Mor
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2389