Observational studies can impact patient care but must be robust and reproducible. Nonreproducibility is primarily caused by unclear reporting of design choices and analytic procedures. This study aimed to: (1) assess how the study logic described in an observational study could be interpreted by independent researchers and (2) quantify the impact of interpretations' variability on patient characteristics.
Author(s): Ostropolets, Anna, Albogami, Yasser, Conover, Mitchell, Banda, Juan M, Baumgartner, William A, Blacketer, Clair, Desai, Priyamvada, DuVall, Scott L, Fortin, Stephen, Gilbert, James P, Golozar, Asieh, Ide, Joshua, Kanter, Andrew S, Kern, David M, Kim, Chungsoo, Lai, Lana Y H, Li, Chenyu, Liu, Feifan, Lynch, Kristine E, Minty, Evan, Neves, Maria Inês, Ng, Ding Quan, Obene, Tontel, Pera, Victor, Pratt, Nicole, Rao, Gowtham, Rappoport, Nadav, Reinecke, Ines, Saroufim, Paola, Shoaibi, Azza, Simon, Katherine, Suchard, Marc A, Swerdel, Joel N, Voss, Erica A, Weaver, James, Zhang, Linying, Hripcsak, George, Ryan, Patrick B
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad009