Many groups are developing computer-interpretable clinical guidelines (CIGs) for use during clinical encounters. CIGs use "Task-Network Models" for representation but differ in their approaches to addressing particular modeling challenges. We have studied similarities and differences between CIGs in order to identify issues that must be resolved before a consensus on a set of common components can be developed.
Author(s): Peleg, Mor, Tu, Samson, Bury, Jonathan, Ciccarese, Paolo, Fox, John, Greenes, Robert A, Hall, Richard, Johnson, Peter D, Jones, Neill, Kumar, Anand, Miksch, Silvia, Quaglini, Silvana, Seyfang, Andreas, Shortliffe, Edward H, Stefanelli, Mario
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.m1135