Characterization of Safety Events Involving Technology in Primary and Community Care

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The adoption of technology in health care settings is often touted as an opportunity to improve patient safety. While some adverse events can be reduced by health information technologies, technology has also been implicated in or attributed to safety events. To date, most studies on this topic have focused on acute care settings.

Objectives To describe voluntarily reported safety events that involved health information technology in community and primary care settings in a large Canadian health care organization.

Methods Two years of safety events involving health information technology (2016–2018) were extracted from an online voluntary safety event reporting system. Events from primary and community care settings were categorized according to clinical setting, type of event, and level of harm. The Sittig and Singh sociotechnical system model was then used to identify the most prominent sociotechnical dimensions of each event.

Results Of 104 reported events, most (n = 85, 82%) indicated the event resulted in no harm. Public health had the highest number of reports (n = 45, 43%), whereas home health had the fewest (n = 7, 7%). Of the 182 sociotechnical concepts identified, many events (n = 61, 59%) mapped to more than one dimension. Personnel (n = 48, 46%), Workflow and Communication (n = 37, 36%), and Content (n = 30, 29%) were the most common. Personnel and Content together was the most common combination of dimensions.

Conclusion Most reported events featured both technical and social dimensions, suggesting that the nature of these events is multifaceted. Leveraging existing safety event reporting systems to screen for safety events involving health information technology, and applying a sociotechnical analytic framework can aid health organizations in identifying, responding to, and learning from reported events.

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This research did not involve human subjects.

Publication History

Received: 02 July 2023

Accepted: 10 October 2023

Article published online:
27 December 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

• References

• 1 Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To Err is Human: building a safer health system. National Academies Press; 2000
  Google Scholar
• 2 Macias M, Bernabeu-Andreu FA, Arribas I, Navarro F, Baldominos G. Impact of a barcode medication administration system on patient safety. Oncol Nurs Forum 2018; 45 (01) E1-E13
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Barakat S, Franklin BD. An evaluation of the impact of barcode patient and medication scanning on nursing workflow at a UK teaching hospital. Pharmacy (Basel) 2020; 8 (03) 148
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Sittig DF, Wright A, Coiera E. et al. Current challenges in health information technology-related patient safety. Health Informatics J 2020; 26 (01) 181-189
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Sittig DF, Singh H. A Sociotechnical Approach to Electronic Health Record Related Safety. Key Advances in Clinical Informatics. Academic Press; 2017: 197-216
  Google Scholar
• 6 Magrabi F, Liaw ST, Arachi D, Runciman W, Coiera E, Kidd MR. Identifying patient safety problems associated with information technology in general practice: an analysis of incident reports. BMJ Qual Saf 2016; 25 (11) 870-880
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Borycki E. Trends in health information technology safety: from technology-induced errors to current approaches for ensuring technology safety. Healthc Inform Res 2013; 19 (02) 69-78
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Sittig DF, Singh H. Defining health information technology-related errors: new developments since to err is human. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171 (14) 1281-1284
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Campbell EM, Sittig DF, Ash JS, Guappone KP, Dykstra RH. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13 (05) 547-556
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Weiner JP, Kfuri T, Chan K, Fowles JB. “e-Iatrogenesis”: the most critical unintended consequence of CPOE and other HIT. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14 (03) 387-388 , discussion 389
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Makeham M, Magrabi F, Hibbert P, Hardie R-A. Literature review and environmental scan on approaches to the review and investigation of health IT-related patient safety incidents. 2017 . Accessed December 11, 2018 at: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library/literature-review-and-environmental-scan-approaches-review-and-investigation-health-it-related-patient-safety-incidents
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Abraham J, Kitsiou S, Meng A, Burton S, Vatani H, Kannampallil T. Effects of CPOE-based medication ordering on outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Qual Saf 2020; 29 (10) 1-2
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Brenner SK, Kaushal R, Grinspan Z. et al. Effects of health information technology on patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016; 23 (05) 1016-1036
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Powell L, Sittig DF, Chrouser K, Singh H. Assessment of health information technology-related outpatient diagnostic delays in the US veterans affairs health care system: a qualitative study of aggregated root cause analysis data. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (06) e206752
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Graber ML, Siegal D, Riah H, Johnston D, Kenyon K. Electronic health record-related events in medical malpractice claims. J Patient Saf 2019; 15 (02) 77-85
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Nanji KC, Rothschild JM, Salzberg C. et al. Errors associated with outpatient computerized prescribing systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18 (06) 767-773
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Ai A, Wong A, Amato M, Wright A. Communication failure: analysis of prescribers' use of an internal free-text field on electronic prescriptions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2018; 25 (06) 709-714
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Lourenco LM, Bursua A, Groo VL. Automatic errors: a case series on the errors inherent in electronic prescribing. J Gen Intern Med 2016; 31 (07) 808-811
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Slight SP, Howard R, Ghaleb M, Barber N, Franklin BD, Avery AJ. The causes of prescribing errors in English general practices: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2013; 63 (615) e713-e720
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Odukoya OK, Chui MA. e-Prescribing: characterisation of patient safety hazards in community pharmacies using a sociotechnical systems approach. BMJ Qual Saf 2013; 22 (10) 816-825
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Canada Health Infoway. Canadian physician survey physicians' use of digital health and information technologies in practice background and methodology. 2018 . Accessed February 24, 2019 at: https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/component/edocman/3643-2018-canadian-physician-survey/view-document?Itemid=0
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Warm D, Edwards P. Classifying health information technology patient safety related incidents - an approach used in Wales. Appl Clin Inform 2012; 3 (02) 248-257
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Palojoki S, Mäkelä M, Lehtonen L, Saranto K. An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety incidents. Health Informatics J 2017; 23 (02) 134-145
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Magrabi F, Baker M, Sinha I. et al. Clinical safety of England's national programme for IT: a retrospective analysis of all reported safety events 2005 to 2011. Int J Med Inform 2015; 84 (03) 198-206
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Fong A, Adams KT, Gaunt MJ, Howe JL, Kellogg KM, Ratwani RM. Identifying health information technology related safety event reports from patient safety event report databases. J Biomed Inform 2018; 86: 135-142
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Martin G, Ghafur S, Cingolani I. et al. The effects and preventability of 2627 patient safety incidents related to health information technology failures: a retrospective analysis of 10 years of incident reporting in England and Wales. Lancet Digit Health 2019; 1 (03) e127-e135
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Mitchell I, Schuster A, Smith K, Pronovost P, Wu A. Patient safety incident reporting: a qualitative study of thoughts and perceptions of experts 15 years after 'To Err is Human'. BMJ Qual Saf 2016; 25 (02) 92-99
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Flemons WW, McRae G. Reporting, learning and the culture of safety. Healthc Q 2012; 15 (Spec No): 12-17
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Singh H, Sittig DF. A sociotechnical framework for safety-related electronic health record research reporting: the SAFER reporting framework. Ann Intern Med 2020; 172 (11) S92-S100
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Runciman WB. Lessons from the Australian Patient Safety Foundation: setting up a national patient safety surveillance system–is this the right model?. Qual Saf Health Care 2002; 11 (03) 246-251
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Howell A-M, Burns EM, Hull L, Mayer E, Sevdalis N, Darzi A. International recommendations for national patient safety incident reporting systems: an expert Delphi consensus-building process. BMJ Qual Saf 2017; 26 (02) 150-163
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Bellwood P, Borycki EM, Kushniruk AW. Awareness of technology-induced errors and processes for identifying and preventing such errors. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 208: 61-65
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Digital Health Canada. e-Safety: Update 2017-2018. e-Safety Community of Action; 2018
  PubMed
• 34 Kaminski J. . Theory applied to informatics: socio-technical theory. Can J Nurs Inform 2022;17(3–4)
  PubMed
• 35 Noble DJ, Pronovost PJ. Underreporting of patient safety incidents reduces health care's ability to quantify and accurately measure harm reduction. J Patient Saf 2010; 6 (04) 247-250
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Macrae C. The problem with incident reporting. BMJ Qual Saf 2016; 25 (02) 71-75
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Gagliardi AR, Berta W, Kothari A, Boyko J, Urquhart R. Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review. Implement Sci 2016; 11: 38
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Cochrane D, Taylor A, Miller G. et al. Establishing a provincial patient safety and learning system: pilot project results and lessons learned. Healthc Q 2009; 12 Spec No Patient: 147-153
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 World Health Organization. Conceptual Framework for the International Classification for Patient Safety: Version 1.1. Vol. 1. 2009
  Google Scholar
• 40 Magrabi F, Ong M-S, Runciman W, Coiera E. An analysis of computer-related patient safety incidents to inform the development of a classification. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010; 17 (06) 663-670
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Sittig DF, Singh H. A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 (Suppl 3, Suppl 3) i68-i74
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Meeks DW, Takian A, Sittig DF, Singh H, Barber N. Exploring the sociotechnical intersection of patient safety and electronic health record implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (e1): e28-e34
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012; 22 (03) 276-282
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Meeks DW, Smith MW, Taylor L, Sittig DF, Scott JM, Singh H. An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (06) 1053-1059
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Castro GM, Buczkowski L, Hafner JM. The contribution of sociotechnical factors to health information technology-related sentinel events. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2016; 42 (02) 70-76
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Kang H, Wang J, Yao B, Zhou S, Gong Y. Toward safer health care: a review strategy of FDA medical device adverse event database to identify and categorize health information technology related events. JAMIA Open 2018; 2 (01) 179-186
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Menon S, Singh H, Giardina TD. et al. Safety huddles to proactively identify and address electronic health record safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (02) 261-267
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Laatikainen O, Miettunen J, Sneck S, Lehtiniemi H, Tenhunen O, Turpeinen M. The prevalence of medication-related adverse events in inpatients-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2017; 73 (12) 1539-1549
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Panagioti M, Khan K, Keers RN. et al. Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2019; 366: l4185
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA. The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 2008; 17 (03) 216-223
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Gens-Barberà M, Hernández-Vidal N, Vidal-Esteve E. et al. Analysis of patient safety incidents in primary care reported in an electronic registry application. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18 (17) 8941
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Williams H, Edwards A, Hibbert P. et al. Harms from discharge to primary care: mixed methods analysis of incident reports. Br J Gen Pract 2015; 65 (641) e829-e837
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Masotti P, McColl MA, Green M. Adverse events experienced by homecare patients: a scoping review of the literature. Int J Qual Health Care 2010; 22 (02) 115-125
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Maillet É, Paré G, Currie LM. et al. Laboratory testing in primary care: a systematic review of health IT impacts. Int J Med Inform 2018; 116: 52-69
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Vincent C, Carthey J, Macrae C, Amalberti R. Safety analysis over time: seven major changes to adverse event investigation. Implement Sci 2017; 12 (01) 151
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Shojania KG. The frustrating case of incident-reporting systems. Qual Saf Health Care 2008; 17 (06) 400-402
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Howe JL, Hettinger AZ, Ratwani RM. Using patient safety-event report data to assess health-IT safety: benefits and challenges. Lancet Digit Health 2019; 1 (03) e104-e105
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Gong Y, Kang H, Wu X, Hua L. Enhancing patient safety event reporting. A systematic review of system design features. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (03) 893-909
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Wyatt KD, Benning TJ, Morgenthaler TI, Arteaga GM. Development of a taxonomy for medication-related patient safety events related to health information technology in pediatrics. Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11 (05) 714-724
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Wang J, Liang H, Kang H, Gong Y. Understanding health information technology induced medication safety events by two conceptual frameworks. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (01) 158-167
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Fong A. Realizing the power of text mining and natural language processing for analyzing patient safety event narratives: the challenges and path forward. J Patient Saf 2021; 17 (08) e834-e836
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Fong A, Komolafe T, Adams KT, Cohen A, Howe JL, Ratwani RM. Exploration and initial development of text classification models to identify health information technology usability-related patient safety event reports. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (03) 521-527
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Jacobson AF, Hamilton P, Galloway J. Obtaining and evaluating data sets for secondary analysis in nursing research. West J Nurs Res 1993; 15 (04) 483-494
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Kim MO, Coiera E, Magrabi F. Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (02) 246-250
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Bonetti D, Johnston M, Pitts NB. et al. Knowledge may not be the best target for strategies to influence evidence-based practice: using psychological models to understand RCT effects. Int J Behav Med 2009; 16 (03) 287-293
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

• Supplementary Material