Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13(04): 971-982
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1757292
Letter to the Editor

User Experience Design for Adoption of Asthma Clinical Decision Support Tools

Emily Gao
1   University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Ilana Radparvar
1   University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Holly Dieu
2   Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
,
Mindy K. Ross
2   Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States
› Author Affiliations

Funding This study was supported by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; National Institutes of Health; and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1K23HL148502-01A1).
PreviewZoom

Background and Significance

Asthma affects over 200 million people worldwide and uncontrolled cases typically lead to the most morbidity.[1] Guidelines can improve asthma symptom control and patient outcomes, although their use in practice is suboptimal (e.g., <40% documented key components).[2] [3] [4] To improve these rates, approaches based on clinical informatics such as guideline-adherent computerized clinical decision support (CDS) tools have been attempted.[5] [6] [7] [8] These tools can provide standardized, personalized, and comprehensive care to improve outcomes.[9] [10] [11]

Asthma CDS tools have not been readily adopted into practice, thus reducing their effectiveness due to lack of use.[9] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] Reasons suggested for low uptake appear similar to general issues with computerized CDS[17] [18] [19] (e.g., poor workflow integration, negative end-user beliefs),[20] [21] [22] but there has not been an inventory of facilitators and barriers to use in the asthma CDS tool domain. Detailing this could improve the design process for asthma-specific computerized CDS tools by highlighting relevant aspects, centralizing knowledge about key features, and identifying the most effective implementation strategies.[23]

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

There were no human subjects in this work.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 19 May 2022

Accepted: 09 August 2022

Article published online:
12 October 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany