Comparison of the Causes of Death Identified Using Automated Verbal Autopsy and Complete Autopsy among Brought-in-Dead Cases at a Tertiary Hospital in Sub-Sahara Africa

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Over one-third of deaths recorded at health facilities in Zambia are brought in dead (BID) and the causes of death (CODs) are not fully analyzed. The use of automated verbal autopsy (VA) has reportedly determined the CODs of more BID cases than the death notification form issued by the hospital. However, the validity of automated VA is yet to be fully investigated.

Objectives To compare the CODs identified by automated VA with those by complete autopsy to examine the validity of a VA tool.

Methods The study site was the tertiary hospital in the capital city of Zambia. From September 2019 to January 2020, all BID cases aged 13 years and older brought to the hospital during the daytime on weekdays were enrolled in this study. External COD cases were excluded. The deceased's relatives were interviewed using the 2016 World Health Organization VA questionnaire. The data were analyzed using InterVA, an automated VA tool, to determine the CODs, which were compared with the results of complete autopsies.

Results A total of 63 cases were included. The CODs of 50 BID cases were determined by both InterVA and complete autopsies. The positive predictive value of InterVA was 22%. InterVA determined the CODs correctly in 100% cases of maternal CODs, 27.5% cases of noncommunicable disease CODs, and 5.3% cases of communicable disease CODs. Using the three broader disease groups, 56.0% cases were classified in the same groups by both methods.

Conclusion While the positive predictive value was low, more than half of the cases were categorized into the same broader categories. However, there are several limitations in this study, including small sample size. More research is required to investigate the factors leading to discrepancies between the CODs determined by both methods to optimize the use of automated VA in Zambia.

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Zambia's Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (ref: 018–12–16) and the Ethics Committee of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine in Japan (ref: NCGM-G-003244–00). Written informed consent was obtained from the closest relatives of the deceased.

Publication History

Received: 22 August 2021

Accepted: 24 March 2022

Article published online:
15 June 2022

© 2022. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

• References

• 1 Mathers CD, Fat DM, Inoue M, Rao C, Lopez AD. Counting the dead and what they died from: an assessment of the global status of cause of death data. Bull World Health Organ 2005; 83 (03) 171-177
  MissingFormLabel

  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 2 Mahapatra P, Shibuya K, Lopez AD. et al; Monitoring Vital Events. Civil registration systems and vital statistics: successes and missed opportunities. Lancet 2007; 370 (9599): 1653-1663
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 3 United Nations Statistics Division. Demographic and social statistics [updated October 20, 2020]. Accessed April 20, 2022 at: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic-social/crvs/
  MissingFormLabel
• 4 Open Working Group for the UN General Assembly. Open Working Group Proposal for Sustainable Development Goals. New York, NY: OWG; 2014
  MissingFormLabel

  Search in Google Scholar
• 5 United Nations. The Road to Dignity by 2030: Ending Poverty, Transforming All Lives and Protecting the Planet Synthesis Report of the Secretary-General on the Post-2015 Agenda. New York, NY: UN; 2014
  MissingFormLabel

  Search in Google Scholar
• 6 Yokobori Y, Obara H, Sugiura Y, Kitamura T. Gaps in the civil registration and vital statistics systems of low- and middle-income countries and the health sector's role in improving the situation. Glob Health Med 2021; 3 (04) 243-245
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 7 Central Statistical Office of Zambia. 2016 Vital Statistics Report. Lusaka: Ministry of Home Affair of Zambia; 2019
  MissingFormLabel

  Search in Google Scholar
• 8 Central Statistical Office of Zambia. 2015/16 Zambia Sample Vital Registration with Verbal Autopsy Report. Lusaka: Ministry of Home Affair of Zambia; 2018
  MissingFormLabel

  Search in Google Scholar
• 9 Centre for Global Health Research.. What is verbal autopsy?. Accessed November 16, 2021 at: http://www.cghr.org/projects/million-death-study-project/what-is-verbal-autopsy/
  MissingFormLabel
• 10 D'Ambruoso L, Boerma T, Byass P. et al. The case for verbal autopsy in health systems strengthening. Lancet Glob Health 2017; 5 (01) e20-e21
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 11 Durrani MIA, Naz T, Atif M, Khalid N, Amelio A. A semantic-based framework for verbal autopsy to identify the cause of maternal death. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (04) 910-923
  MissingFormLabel

  Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 12 World Health Organization. Verbal Autopsy Standards: Ascertaining and Attributing Case of Death. Geneva: WHO; 2007
  MissingFormLabel

  Search in Google Scholar
• 13 Baqui AH, Black RE, Arifeen SE, Hill K, Mitra SN, al Sabir A. Causes of childhood deaths in Bangladesh: results of a nationwide verbal autopsy study. Bull World Health Organ 1998; 76 (02) 161-171
  MissingFormLabel

  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 14 Indian Council of Medical Research. Study on Causes of Death by Verbal Autopsy in India. New Delhi: ICMR; 2009
  MissingFormLabel

  Search in Google Scholar
• 15 Dharmaratne SD, Jayasuriya RL, Perera BY, Gunesekera E, Sathasivayyar A. Opportunities and challenges for verbal autopsy in the national Death Registration System in Sri Lanka: past and future. Popul Health Metr 2011; 9: 21
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 16 França E, Campos D, Guimarães MD, Souza MdeF. Use of verbal autopsy in a national health information system: effects of the investigation of ill-defined causes of death on proportional mortality due to injury in small municipalities in Brazil. Popul Health Metr 2011; 9: 39
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 17 Durrani MIA, Qureshi NS, Ahmad N, Naz T, Amelio A. A health informatics reporting system for technology illiterate workforce using mobile phone. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (02) 348-357
  MissingFormLabel

  Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 18 Miasnikof P, Giannakeas V, Gomes M. et al. Naive Bayes classifiers for verbal autopsies: comparison to physician-based classification for 21,000 child and adult deaths. BMC Med 2015; 13: 286
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 19 Flaxman AD, Joseph JC, Murray CJL, Riley ID, Lopez AD. Performance of InSilicoVA for assigning causes of death to verbal autopsies: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standards. BMC Med 2018; 16 (01) 56
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 20 Murtaza SS, Kolpak P, Bener A, Jha P. Automated verbal autopsy classification: using one-against-all ensemble method and Naïve Bayes classifier. Gates Open Res 2019; 2: 63
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 21 Nichols EK, Byass P, Chandramohan D. et al; WHO Verbal Autopsy Working Group. The WHO 2016 verbal autopsy instrument: an international standard suitable for automated analysis by InterVA, InSilicoVA, and Tariff 2.0. PLoS Med 2018; 15 (01) e1002486
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 22 Byass P, Hussain-Alkhateeb L, D'Ambruoso L. et al. An integrated approach to processing WHO-2016 verbal autopsy data: the InterVA-5 model. BMC Med 2019; 17 (01) 102
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 23 Phillips-Howard PA, Laserson KF, Amek N. et al. Deaths ascribed to non-communicable diseases among rural Kenyan adults are proportionately increasing: evidence from a health and demographic surveillance system, 2003-2010. PLoS One 2014; 9 (11) e114010
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 24 Godefay H, Kinsman J, Admasu K, Byass P. Can innovative ambulance transport avert pregnancy-related deaths? One-year operational assessment in Ethiopia. J Glob Health 2016; 6 (01) 010410
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 25 Maraba N, Karat AS, McCarthy K. et al. Verbal autopsy-assigned causes of death among adults being investigated for TB in South Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2016; 110 (09) 510-516
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 26 Coates MM, Kamanda M, Kintu A. et al. A comparison of all-cause and cause-specific mortality by household socioeconomic status across seven INDEPTH network health and demographic surveillance systems in sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Health Action 2019; 12 (01) 1608013
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 27 Dandona R, Kumar GA, Bhattacharya D. et al. Distinct mortality patterns at 0-2 days versus the remaining neonatal period: results from population-based assessment in the Indian state of Bihar. BMC Med 2019; 17 (01) 140
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 28 Yokobori Y, Matsuura J, Sugiura Y. et al. Analysis of causes of death among brought-in-dead cases in a third-level Hospital in Lusaka, Republic of Zambia, using the tariff method 2.0 for verbal autopsy: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2020; 20 (01) 473
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 29 Serina P, Riley I, Stewart A. et al. A shortened verbal autopsy instrument for use in routine mortality surveillance systems. BMC Med 2015; 13: 302
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 30 Ramroth H, Lorenz E, Rankin JC. et al. Cause of death distribution with InterVA and physician coding in a rural area of Burkina Faso. Trop Med Int Health 2012; 17 (07) 904-913
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 31 Lozano R, Freeman MK, James SL. et al; Population Health Metrics Research Consortium (PHMRC). Performance of InterVA for assigning causes of death to verbal autopsies: multisite validation study using clinical diagnostic gold standards. Popul Health Metr 2011; 9: 50
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 32 Bauni E, Ndila C, Mochamah G. et al. Validating physician-certified verbal autopsy and probabilistic modeling (InterVA) approaches to verbal autopsy interpretation using hospital causes of adult deaths. Popul Health Metr 2011; 9: 49
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 33 Tadesse S. Agreement between physicians and the InterVA-4 model in assigning causes of death: the role of recall period and characteristics specific to the deceased and the respondent. Arch Public Health 2013; 71 (01) 28
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 34 Fantahun M, Fottrell E, Berhane Y, Wall S, Högberg U, Byass P. Assessing a new approach to verbal autopsy interpretation in a rural Ethiopian community: the InterVA model. Bull World Health Organ 2006; 84 (03) 204-210
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 35 James SL, Flaxman AD, Murray CJ. Population Health Metrics Research Consortium (PHMRC). Performance of the Tariff Method: validation of a simple additive algorithm for analysis of verbal autopsies. Popul Health Metr 2011; 9: 31
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 36 Central Statistical Office of Zambia. 2010 Census of Population and Housing. Analytical Report. Lusaka: CSO; 2012
  MissingFormLabel

  Search in Google Scholar
• 37 World Health Organization. Health statistics and information system. Verbal autopsy standards: ascertaining and attributing cause of death. The 2016 WHO verbal autopsy instrument. 2020. Accessed February 19, 2020 at: https://score.tools.who.int/tools/count-births-deaths-and-causes-of-death/tool/verbal-autopsy-standards-the-2016-who-verbal-autopsy-instrument-23/
  MissingFormLabel
• 38 Open Data Kit. Collect data anywhere. Accessed February 19, 2020 at: https://getodk.org/#features
  MissingFormLabel
• 39 Byass P, Huong DL, Minh HV. A probabilistic approach to interpreting verbal autopsies: methodology and preliminary validation in Vietnam. Scand J Public Health Suppl 2003; 62: 32-37
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 40 Byass P, Chandramohan D, Clark SJ. et al. Strengthening standardised interpretation of verbal autopsy data: the new InterVA-4 tool. Glob Health Action 2012; 5: 1-8
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 41 Byass P, Fottrell E, Dao LH. et al. Refining a probabilistic model for interpreting verbal autopsy data. Scand J Public Health 2006; 34 (01) 26-31
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 42 Tensou B, Araya T, Telake DS. et al. Evaluating the InterVA model for determining AIDS mortality from verbal autopsies in the adult population of Addis Ababa. Trop Med Int Health 2010; 15 (05) 547-553
  MissingFormLabel

  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 43 McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012; 22 (03) 276-282
  MissingFormLabel

  Search in Google Scholar
• 44 WHO. ICD-10 Version: 2019. February 28, 2021 Available at: https://icd.who.int/browse10/2019/en
  MissingFormLabel
• 45 McCormick TH, Li ZR, Calvert C, Crampin AC, Kahn K, Clark SJ. Probabilistic cause-of-death assignment using verbal autopsies. J Am Stat Assoc 2016; 111 (515) 1036-1049
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 46 Oti SO, Kyobutungi C. Verbal autopsy interpretation: a comparative analysis of the InterVA model versus physician review in determining causes of death in the Nairobi DSS. Popul Health Metr 2010; 8: 21
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 47 Desai N, Aleksandrowicz L, Miasnikof P. et al. Performance of four computer-coded verbal autopsy methods for cause of death assignment compared with physician coding on 24,000 deaths in low- and middle-income countries. BMC Med 2014; 12: 20
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 48 Byass P, Herbst K, Fottrell E. et al. Comparing verbal autopsy cause of death findings as determined by physician coding and probabilistic modelling: a public health analysis of 54 000 deaths in Africa and Asia. J Glob Health 2015; 5 (01) 010402
  MissingFormLabel

  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 49 Weldearegawi B, Melaku YA, Dinant GJ, Spigt M. How much do the physician review and InterVA model agree in determining causes of death? A comparative analysis of deaths in rural Ethiopia. BMC Public Health 2015; 15 (01) 669
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 50 Aase S. Autopsy–still the gold standard?. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2013; 133 (07) 730-731
  MissingFormLabel

  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 51 Rodriguez L, Reyes H, Tome P, Ridaura C, Flores S, Guiscafre H. Validation of the verbal autopsy method to ascertain acute respiratory infection as cause of death. Indian J Pediatr 1998; 65 (04) 579-584
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 52 Misganaw A, Mariam DH, Araya T, Aneneh A. Validity of verbal autopsy method to determine causes of death among adults in the urban setting of Ethiopia. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012; 12: 130
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 53 Roulson J, Benbow EW, Hasleton PS. Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of post mortem histology; a meta-analysis and review. Histopathology 2005; 47 (06) 551-559
  MissingFormLabel

  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar

• Supplementary Material